- Description has changed:

Diff:

~~~~

--- old
+++ new
@@ -10,6 +10,12 @@
 It is important that *everyone* understands this.
 There is no magic being done here.
 
-Use case: opensaf cloud deployment
+Use case: opensaf cloud deployment. In a cloud deployment, the risk for 
multiple simultaneous node failures is increased due to a number of reasons:
+
+* The hardware used to build cloud infrastructure may not be carrier-grade.
+* The hypervisor is an extra layer which can also cause VM failures.
+* Multiple VMs can be hosted on the same physical hardware. There is no 
standardized interface for querying if two nodes are located on the same 
physical machine.
+* Live migration of VMs can cause disruptions
+* The "Pets vs cattle" thinking: There is an expectation that VMs can be 
treated as "cattle", i.e. that the loss of a few VMs shall not have a 
devastating effect on the whole cluster (which can consist of a hundred nodes).
 
 To be refined a lot...

~~~~




---

** [tickets:#1132] opensaf shall support indefinite unavailbility of both 
controllers**

**Status:** unassigned
**Milestone:** 4.6.FC
**Created:** Tue Sep 23, 2014 01:51 PM UTC by Hans Feldt
**Last Updated:** Thu Nov 27, 2014 02:37 PM UTC
**Owner:** nobody

The opensaf cluster shall survive that both system controllers are indefinitely 
unavaliable i.e. down (no cluster reboot as today)

After the system controllers recover, IMM and AMF state shall be as before the 
controllers got unavailable.

Since AMF state can not change, this means that AMF can not react to
service availability events. This means that service availability (a statistical
property) will be impacted in relation to how often this new feature is
excercised.

It is important that *everyone* understands this.
There is no magic being done here.

Use case: opensaf cloud deployment. In a cloud deployment, the risk for 
multiple simultaneous node failures is increased due to a number of reasons:

* The hardware used to build cloud infrastructure may not be carrier-grade.
* The hypervisor is an extra layer which can also cause VM failures.
* Multiple VMs can be hosted on the same physical hardware. There is no 
standardized interface for querying if two nodes are located on the same 
physical machine.
* Live migration of VMs can cause disruptions
* The "Pets vs cattle" thinking: There is an expectation that VMs can be 
treated as "cattle", i.e. that the loss of a few VMs shall not have a 
devastating effect on the whole cluster (which can consist of a hundred nodes).

To be refined a lot...


---

Sent from sourceforge.net because [email protected] is 
subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/opensaf/tickets/

To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at 
https://sourceforge.net/p/opensaf/admin/tickets/options.  Or, if this is a 
mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more
Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157005751&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-tickets mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-tickets

Reply via email to