On 07-Mar-14 6:42 AM, Lisa Ann Lentz-Liddell wrote: > We are running OpenSAF4.4 RC2. > > We are converting from using SAFfire to OpenSAF. > > We have a SU with multiple components. All of the components are of the same > process (running multiple copies of the same process). These components > receive via the csi attribute what data they should work on. All components > within the same SU receive the same value attribute value (we need multiple > copies of the same process working on the same data). When we unlock the > service unit, we see that only some of the components receive the csi > attribute. It is inconsistent on how many of the components will actually > receive the csi attribute. > > Trace from our logs, the SU has 8 components 1.3.1 -> 1.3.8. Only 6 of 8 > components received the CSI attribute, comp 1.3.2 and 1.3.5 did not receive > the csi attribute: > $ grep CSI amfOELCComp1.3*.LOG | grep TMPI | grep attr > amfOELCComp1.3.1.155952.LOG:20781:47833720:INFORM----TMPIgenericMain.cc:2781:06/03/2014 > 16:00:13 > TMPI-30021: CSI assignment has been received with attribute value > of targetDG=3. > amfOELCComp1.3.3.155951.LOG:20571:BEFD4720:INFORM----TMPIgenericMain.cc:2781:06/03/2014 > 16:00:13 > TMPI-30021: CSI assignment has been received with attribute value > of targetDG=3. > amfOELCComp1.3.4.155951.LOG:20466:3C85E720:INFORM----TMPIgenericMain.cc:2781:06/03/2014 > 16:00:13 > TMPI-30021: CSI assignment has been received with attribute value > of targetDG=3. > amfOELCComp1.3.6.155951.LOG:20256:654D1720:INFORM----TMPIgenericMain.cc:2781:06/03/2014 > 16:00:12 > TMPI-30021: CSI assignment has been received with attribute value > of targetDG=3. > amfOELCComp1.3.7.155950.LOG:20151:F5132720:INFORM----TMPIgenericMain.cc:2781:06/03/2014 > 16:00:12 > TMPI-30021: CSI assignment has been received with attribute value > of targetDG=3. > amfOELCComp1.3.8.155950.LOG:20047:16F81720:INFORM----TMPIgenericMain.cc:2781:06/03/2014 > 16:00:12 > TMPI-30021: CSI assignment has been received with attribute value > of targetDG=3. > > Stop/Restarted the cluster, ran again, all components received a csi > attribute for the same SU: > $ grep CSI amfOELCComp1.3*.19*.LOG | grep attr > amfOELCComp1.3.1.195615.LOG:26890:628C0720:INFORM----TMPIgenericMain.cc:2781:06/03/2014 > 19:56:23 > TMPI-30021: CSI assignment has been received with attribute value > of targetDG=3. > amfOELCComp1.3.2.195615.LOG:26785:8B521720:INFORM----TMPIgenericMain.cc:2781:06/03/2014 > 19:56:23 > TMPI-30021: CSI assignment has been received with attribute value > of targetDG=3. > amfOELCComp1.3.3.195614.LOG:26678:9A3C1720:INFORM----TMPIgenericMain.cc:2781:06/03/2014 > 19:56:23 > TMPI-30021: CSI assignment has been received with attribute value > of targetDG=3. > amfOELCComp1.3.4.195614.LOG:26574:4EF16720:INFORM----TMPIgenericMain.cc:2781:06/03/2014 > 19:56:23 > TMPI-30021: CSI assignment has been received with attribute value > of targetDG=3. > amfOELCComp1.3.5.195614.LOG:26468:D0DF0720:INFORM----TMPIgenericMain.cc:2781:06/03/2014 > 19:56:22 > TMPI-30021: CSI assignment has been received with attribute value > of targetDG=3. > amfOELCComp1.3.6.195614.LOG:26363:71DC2720:INFORM----TMPIgenericMain.cc:2781:06/03/2014 > 19:56:22 > TMPI-30021: CSI assignment has been received with attribute value > of targetDG=3. > amfOELCComp1.3.7.195614.LOG:26257:30EC5720:INFORM----TMPIgenericMain.cc:2781:06/03/2014 > 19:56:22 > TMPI-30021: CSI assignment has been received with attribute value > of targetDG=3. > amfOELCComp1.3.8.195613.LOG:26152:DCE68720:INFORM----TMPIgenericMain.cc:2781:06/03/2014 > 19:56:22 > TMPI-30021: CSI assignment has been received with attribute value > of targetDG=3. > > But another SU with the same look as the above SU (total 8 components) only 5 > out of 8 components received the CSI attribute: > $ grep CSI amfOELCComp1.4.*.19*.LOG | grep attr > amfOELCComp1.4.1.195748.LOG:27893:FCB13720:INFORM----TMPIgenericMain.cc:2781:06/03/2014 > 19:58:00 > TMPI-30021: CSI assignment has been received with attribute value > of targetDG=2. > amfOELCComp1.4.2.195748.LOG:27787:BC487720:INFORM----TMPIgenericMain.cc:2781:06/03/2014 > 19:58:00 > TMPI-30021: CSI assignment has been received with attribute value > of targetDG=2. > amfOELCComp1.4.4.195748.LOG:27577:DADF3720:INFORM----TMPIgenericMain.cc:2781:06/03/2014 > 19:57:59 > TMPI-30021: CSI assignment has been received with attribute value > of targetDG=2. > amfOELCComp1.4.6.195747.LOG:27368:C053A720:INFORM----TMPIgenericMain.cc:2781:06/03/2014 > 19:57:59 > TMPI-30021: CSI assignment has been received with attribute value > of targetDG=2. > amfOELCComp1.4.8.195747.LOG:27158:2EE50720:INFORM----TMPIgenericMain.cc:2781:06/03/2014 > 19:57:58 > TMPI-30021: CSI assignment has been received with attribute value > of targetDG=2. > > All of our CSIs for the SI are configured with a csi attribute e.g. > <object class="SaAmfCSIAttribute"> > > <dn>safCsiAttr=targetDG,safCsi=amfOELCElfCompCSI1.4.1,safSi=amfOELCSI1.4,safApp=olcApp</dn> > <attr> > <name>display</name> > <value>OELCCSI Attribute1.4.1</value> > </attr> As per AMF spec, class SaAmfCSIAttribute has only one attribute which is saAmfCSIAttriValue. Why "<name>display</name>' is configured?
Thanks Praveen > <attr> > <name>saAmfCSIAttriValue</name> > <value>targetDG=4</value> > </attr> > </object> > > Any help with debugging this? > > Thanks. > > Lisa Lentz-Liddell | Technical Consultant, Forward R&D | Office: +1 (800) > 519-8360 x4569 | Direct Dial +1 (513) 345-7869 | www.NetCracker.com > Proven Partner to Communications Service Providers > > > > > ________________________________ > The information transmitted herein is intended only for the person or entity > to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary and/or > privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use > of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or > entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received > this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any > computer. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce. > With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. > Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN optimization and the > freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce. > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Opensaf-users mailing list > Opensaf-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce. With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN optimization and the freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Opensaf-users mailing list Opensaf-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-users
