Does this XML validate using xmllint and the xsd?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: praveen malviya [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: den 7 mars 2014 10:47
> To: Lisa Ann Lentz-Liddell
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [users] CSI attribute not received by all components within SU
> 
> 
> On 07-Mar-14 6:42 AM, Lisa Ann Lentz-Liddell wrote:
> > We are running OpenSAF4.4 RC2.
> >
> > We are converting from using SAFfire to OpenSAF.
> >
> > We have a SU with multiple components.  All of the components are of the 
> > same process (running multiple copies of the same
> process).  These components receive via the csi attribute what data they 
> should work on.  All components within the same SU receive
> the same value attribute value (we need multiple copies of the same process 
> working on the same data).  When we unlock the
> service unit, we see that only some of the components receive the csi 
> attribute.  It is inconsistent on how many of the components
> will actually receive the csi attribute.
> >
> > Trace from our logs, the SU has 8 components 1.3.1 -> 1.3.8.  Only 6 of 8 
> > components received the CSI attribute, comp 1.3.2 and 1.3.5
> did not receive the csi attribute:
> > $ grep CSI amfOELCComp1.3*.LOG | grep TMPI | grep attr
> > amfOELCComp1.3.1.155952.LOG:20781:47833720:INFORM----TMPIgenericMain.cc:2781:06/03/2014
> >  16:00:13 > TMPI-30021: CSI
> assignment has been received with attribute value of targetDG=3.
> > amfOELCComp1.3.3.155951.LOG:20571:BEFD4720:INFORM----TMPIgenericMain.cc:2781:06/03/2014
> >  16:00:13 > TMPI-30021: CSI
> assignment has been received with attribute value of targetDG=3.
> > amfOELCComp1.3.4.155951.LOG:20466:3C85E720:INFORM----TMPIgenericMain.cc:2781:06/03/2014
> >  16:00:13 > TMPI-30021: CSI
> assignment has been received with attribute value of targetDG=3.
> > amfOELCComp1.3.6.155951.LOG:20256:654D1720:INFORM----TMPIgenericMain.cc:2781:06/03/2014
> >  16:00:12 > TMPI-30021: CSI
> assignment has been received with attribute value of targetDG=3.
> > amfOELCComp1.3.7.155950.LOG:20151:F5132720:INFORM----TMPIgenericMain.cc:2781:06/03/2014
> >  16:00:12 > TMPI-30021: CSI
> assignment has been received with attribute value of targetDG=3.
> > amfOELCComp1.3.8.155950.LOG:20047:16F81720:INFORM----TMPIgenericMain.cc:2781:06/03/2014
> >  16:00:12 > TMPI-30021: CSI
> assignment has been received with attribute value of targetDG=3.
> >
> > Stop/Restarted the cluster, ran again, all components received a csi 
> > attribute for the same SU:
> > $ grep CSI amfOELCComp1.3*.19*.LOG | grep attr
> > amfOELCComp1.3.1.195615.LOG:26890:628C0720:INFORM----TMPIgenericMain.cc:2781:06/03/2014
> >  19:56:23 > TMPI-30021: CSI
> assignment has been received with attribute value of targetDG=3.
> > amfOELCComp1.3.2.195615.LOG:26785:8B521720:INFORM----TMPIgenericMain.cc:2781:06/03/2014
> >  19:56:23 > TMPI-30021: CSI
> assignment has been received with attribute value of targetDG=3.
> > amfOELCComp1.3.3.195614.LOG:26678:9A3C1720:INFORM----TMPIgenericMain.cc:2781:06/03/2014
> >  19:56:23 > TMPI-30021: CSI
> assignment has been received with attribute value of targetDG=3.
> > amfOELCComp1.3.4.195614.LOG:26574:4EF16720:INFORM----TMPIgenericMain.cc:2781:06/03/2014
> >  19:56:23 > TMPI-30021: CSI
> assignment has been received with attribute value of targetDG=3.
> > amfOELCComp1.3.5.195614.LOG:26468:D0DF0720:INFORM----TMPIgenericMain.cc:2781:06/03/2014
> >  19:56:22 > TMPI-30021: CSI
> assignment has been received with attribute value of targetDG=3.
> > amfOELCComp1.3.6.195614.LOG:26363:71DC2720:INFORM----TMPIgenericMain.cc:2781:06/03/2014
> >  19:56:22 > TMPI-30021: CSI
> assignment has been received with attribute value of targetDG=3.
> > amfOELCComp1.3.7.195614.LOG:26257:30EC5720:INFORM----TMPIgenericMain.cc:2781:06/03/2014
> >  19:56:22 > TMPI-30021: CSI
> assignment has been received with attribute value of targetDG=3.
> > amfOELCComp1.3.8.195613.LOG:26152:DCE68720:INFORM----TMPIgenericMain.cc:2781:06/03/2014
> >  19:56:22 > TMPI-30021: CSI
> assignment has been received with attribute value of targetDG=3.
> >
> > But another SU with the same look as the above SU (total 8 components) only 
> > 5 out of 8 components received the CSI attribute:
> > $ grep CSI amfOELCComp1.4.*.19*.LOG | grep attr
> > amfOELCComp1.4.1.195748.LOG:27893:FCB13720:INFORM----TMPIgenericMain.cc:2781:06/03/2014
> >  19:58:00 > TMPI-30021: CSI
> assignment has been received with attribute value of targetDG=2.
> > amfOELCComp1.4.2.195748.LOG:27787:BC487720:INFORM----TMPIgenericMain.cc:2781:06/03/2014
> >  19:58:00 > TMPI-30021: CSI
> assignment has been received with attribute value of targetDG=2.
> > amfOELCComp1.4.4.195748.LOG:27577:DADF3720:INFORM----TMPIgenericMain.cc:2781:06/03/2014
> >  19:57:59 > TMPI-30021: CSI
> assignment has been received with attribute value of targetDG=2.
> > amfOELCComp1.4.6.195747.LOG:27368:C053A720:INFORM----TMPIgenericMain.cc:2781:06/03/2014
> >  19:57:59 > TMPI-30021: CSI
> assignment has been received with attribute value of targetDG=2.
> > amfOELCComp1.4.8.195747.LOG:27158:2EE50720:INFORM----TMPIgenericMain.cc:2781:06/03/2014
> >  19:57:58 > TMPI-30021: CSI
> assignment has been received with attribute value of targetDG=2.
> >
> > All of our CSIs for the SI are configured with a csi attribute e.g.
> >     <object class="SaAmfCSIAttribute">
> >          
> > <dn>safCsiAttr=targetDG,safCsi=amfOELCElfCompCSI1.4.1,safSi=amfOELCSI1.4,safApp=olcApp</dn>
> >          <attr>
> >              <name>display</name>
> >              <value>OELCCSI Attribute1.4.1</value>
> >          </attr>
> As per AMF spec, class SaAmfCSIAttribute has only one attribute which is
> saAmfCSIAttriValue. Why "<name>display</name>' is configured?
> 
> Thanks
> Praveen
> >          <attr>
> >              <name>saAmfCSIAttriValue</name>
> >              <value>targetDG=4</value>
> >          </attr>
> >      </object>
> >
> > Any help with debugging this?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Lisa Lentz-Liddell | Technical Consultant, Forward R&D | Office: +1 (800) 
> > 519-8360 x4569 | Direct Dial +1 (513) 345-7869 |
> www.NetCracker.com
> > Proven Partner to Communications Service Providers
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > The information transmitted herein is intended only for the person or 
> > entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential,
> proprietary and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, 
> dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance
> upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended 
> recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please
> contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to 
> > Perforce.
> > With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works.
> > Faster operations. Version large binaries.  Built-in WAN optimization and 
> > the
> > freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce.
> > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> > _______________________________________________
> > Opensaf-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-users
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce.
> With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works.
> Faster operations. Version large binaries.  Built-in WAN optimization and the
> freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Opensaf-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce.
With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. 
Faster operations. Version large binaries.  Built-in WAN optimization and the
freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-users

Reply via email to