Gerrit Voss wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 16:50 +0100, Marcus Lindblom wrote: > >> Ugh. I don't like global things. But it seems the only way to distribute >> things in a cluster without having them shown (otherwise there wouldn't >> be a MaterialPool), or? > > not quite IIRC it was more to be able to store materials that are not > referenced from withing the graph in a file (osb). If you want to for > example store material variants with the model. > > The file part is the tricky bit as it usually works/sees on a (sub)tree. > The cluster is much more straight forward as it does not rely on the > graph.
Right. That makes more sense than my version. :) This could be adressed by fixing the file-format, by allowing not only for the node-graph but a generic set of named/tagged FCs. Any plans there? Cheers, /Marcus ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Opensg-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-core
