On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 5:06 AM, Gerrit Voss <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 19:13 -0600, Allen Bierbaum wrote:
>> Did anything ever get decided?
>
> unfortunately not really ;-(.
>
>> Specifically:
>>
>> - What is the status of documentation?  Will the IEEE VR tutorial
>> produce documentation that can be used?  What method will be used for
>> the OpenSG 2.0 documentation (doxygen, trac, other)?  In the near term
>> it would be *very* helpful to have a document describing the new
>> pointer types.
>
> I started to clean up the documentation structure, currently only
> Base, System hopefully soon so we have the canvas to get it up-to-date.
> As for the method, I would go for doxygen. Can the doxgen result
> be integrated into trac easily ?

I haven't done it, but I think Dirk has.  Dirk?

Is there any documention for the new pointer types?

>
>> - Has anyone had any more thoughts related to roadmap?  Just to throw
>> something out there for discussion here is an idea:
>>
>>   1) Enter feature freeze ASAP.
>
> I'm a little split if I at least should try to finish the high-level
> Material/Chunk reshuffle for this or not. Also we have to decide
> which of the to be ported stuff we want to get over before that.
> IMHO at least the remaining loaders should make it. Some other
> parts require more thinking.

What is the Material/Chunk reshuffle?

Do we have a list of "yet to be ported" stuff?  This sounds like a
good thing to put on the wiki, decide as a group what to port, and
then add tickets for each of those.  I think Carsten has been doing a
lot of this porting as well, so maybe he already has a list.

>>   2) Once known major bugs are fixed, create an RC1 branch for
>> testing.  (Mar 13)
>
> As of now I will be traveling on the 12th so doing the RC1 on the 13th
> might be a little tough. I would prefer to try to finish on the 11th.
> Given that this date is a week away, I'm not really sure if this makes
> sense but we should at least give it a try. I also loose access to most
> of my machines after Friday (due to a spatial shift to Germany) so
> somebody else will have to do the final builds.

IMHO, we don't need 'builds", but could just have people start using
the branch.  I think most of the people that will be testing the code
and fixing bugs will be using the source any way right?

>
>>      I know our group will be willing to provide extensive testing of
>> this branch and this will provide a stable "release" for the IEEE VR
>> audience.
>>   3) Create list of outstanding issues to address (as tickets?).  Have
>> release manager coordinate the issue resolutions.
>
> I started this for the to be ported things (wiki) and I started to sort
> through the open tickets. I try to go through my internal list and see
> what is in there.

Where are these lists?

>
>>   4) Burn down list of issues.  If major issues found then create new
>> RC2, etc for testing.
>>   5) Target release of OpenSG 2.0 by May 1st.
>
> the 4)/5) time-line is in general fine with me (as of now).

Glad to hear it. I thought this would be the scariest one. :)

>
>> As Patrick said earlier, he is able to help support and coordinate
>> this as needed.  I am also willing to provide other engineers to test
>> the system, provide feedback on documentation, and run down any issues
>> encountered.  If possible, we will help fix the issue, but from
>> previous experience I know this may take GV or CN to do the real fix.
>
> I'm fine with spending time either fixing things or at least providing
> help to track them down and find a solution.

Sounds good.

-Allen

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________
Opensg-core mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-core

Reply via email to