Antonio Bleile wrote:
> Marcus Lindblom wrote:
>> Antonio Bleile wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I looked at the CVS but couldn't find any revision that didn't ignore the
>>> decorators:
>>>
>>> http://opensg.cvs.sourceforge.net/opensg/OpenSG/Source/System/Window/OSGFBOViewport.cpp?revision=1.9&view=markup
>>>
>>> Look around line 640....
>>>
>>> Which version are you using?
>>>
>> I'm still using my own homecooked version. :) Project pressure etc has
>> kept me from updating to the proper 1.8 release.
>>
>> I have no idea why one would want to ignore decorators, and I missed
>> that this "feature" was added when the FBOViewport was integrated into
>> the 1.8 source tree. (There was never any such code in my version which
>> I initially got from Yvonne).
>>
>
> So can we merge it now? Can you send me your version so I can
> test it and send a patch? Or will you do that? ;)
My version just has the lines that extracts the "real" camera removed,
so it's not difficult to patch and test.
I.e, I just do this, instead of the while-loop, etc.
action->setCamera(getCamera().getCPtr());
I suspect the original stuff is there for some reason, so it would be
interesting to hear why, but adding a ticket is probably a good idea. Go
ahead.
Cheers,
/Marcus
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
