Firestorm bloated ? there some bugs that make it not useable for me. As
example i cannot use teapot because there's no vector copy in edit.
A viewer need to have at least the following extra things.
-Radar
-AO
-Advanced edit tools, like vector copy and texture align, also the wider
setting with numbers, like hollow = 99
-Mesh view and upload !
Further is the V3 notification system much nicer to have, also the way
you can arrange buttons.
Sofar i cannot think about more things then what we have inside
singularity V1
On 2012-12-11 21:04, Mircea Kitsune wrote:
I noticed most users prefer Firestorm and it's considered the best
third-party viewer at this day. Although it's a thing of personal
preference, I am a bit worried that Firestorm gets all the attention,
since I'm not seeing any of the other viewers getting mentioned much
since Firestorm is there. Like I said I don't like it because it's
very bloated and slow... the ideal viewer for me is one just like the
official SL client but with a grid manager, build / upload limits
removed, and new features added.
As far as I know the Second Life viewer is GPL licensed, so
distributing it should be possible like any other GPL software.
Excluding the Havoc library which supposedly caused OpenSim support to
go away. Changes unrelated to the Havoc lib should always be GPL too,
so if LL adds something that OpenSim viewer can integrate it should be
ok. OpenSim is MIT licensed if I remember right, but there's nothing
wrong with distributing a MIT code and a GPL one under the same name
and website.
Building a viewer from scratch is something I don't believe will
happen or needs to happen. It would be an enormous amount of work,
only to achieve something very similar to what's already there. The SL
viewer just needs work in places where Linden didn't give it much
attention, but is well optimized in many areas.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 15:55:28 +0100
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] OpenSim's direction after Linden cutting
support, and the possibility of an official OpenSim viewer
I much prefer using Firestorm for OpenSim since developers have
clearly separated Opensim version from the SL one. Firestorm 431 31155
version is very powerful and there are of course some lacks.
But Firestorm developers are very responsive and they opened a section
OpenSim in their Jira (successfully tested).
On the other hand, we can always think that people who have made a
server would be best placed to make a viewer. Except that this would
lead to a paradoxical situation where OpenSim developers ask Linden
Lab permission to use sources V2/3/4, keeping in mind that the issue
of licenses would remain the same that withthe SL viewer and the
viewer FireStorm.
As for building a viewer from scratch, as did our realXtend friends
.... it's difficult to gather enough people and get results in a
significant delay.
GCI
_______________________________________________
Opensim-dev mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
_______________________________________________ Opensim-dev mailing
list [email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
_______________________________________________
Opensim-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
_______________________________________________
Opensim-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
