On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 03:16:49AM -0400, Peter Memishian wrote: > Is this horse dead yet?
No > Huh? The conclusion was already reached that the choice of separator is > immaterial since it will be quoted anyway. Pursuant to that, John and I > agreed to use ":" because it already has precedent with zoneadm(1M) (and > has been a Unix separator character in other contexts such as /etc files > since the dawn of time). How should scripts unescape escaped separators? Nico --
