John Leser wrote:
> Nicolas Williams wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 03:16:49AM -0400, Peter Memishian wrote:
>>> Is this horse dead yet?
>>
>> No
>>
>>> Huh?  The conclusion was already reached that the choice of separator is
>>> immaterial since it will be quoted anyway.  Pursuant to that, John and I
>>> agreed to use ":" because it already has precedent with zoneadm(1M) (and
>>> has been a Unix separator character in other contexts such as /etc files
>>> since the dawn of time).
>>
>> How should scripts unescape escaped separators?
> 
> The "read" command handles this for you if you set IFS correctly (and 
> the escape character is \).

hmm ... relying on people to set IFS seems somewhat more error-prone than 
providing an option to specify the field separation character of the 
parsable output (as was previously suggested).

Michael
-- 
Michael Schuster        http://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'

Reply via email to