Roland Mainz wrote:
> Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>   
>> Joseph Kowalski wrote:
>>     
> [snip] 
>   
>> All of my other complaints/arguments related to the attempt to extend
>> this case beyond dladm.  Creation of a new, perhaps non-obvious, parsed
>> language/file format as a generic standard for everyone else to use
>> starts to get difficult (and probably fails the "obvious" test for fast
>> tracks.)
>>     
>
> Erm..  it would be nice not to "threaten" other people's project (like
> the libcompoundvar.so.1 one) with a "full ARC case" just because they
> want to address a generic problem at the root... ;-(
>
> ----
>
> Bye,
> Roland
>   


Erm,... yourself!

Full cases are probably appropriate in this case.

The problem is that somehow there seems to be a belief that full cases 
need to be hard.  Not sure if this is a real problem or a perceived 
problem.  This is the problem.

Real architects should relish to opportunity to address the problem at 
the root.  They should not do that as a side-effect of a specific project.

- jek3



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/attachments/20080613/13731fd7/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: dilbert20122245080304.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 23938 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/attachments/20080613/13731fd7/attachment.gif>

Reply via email to