Nicolas Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 03:16:49AM -0400, Peter Memishian wrote:
>> Is this horse dead yet?
> 
> No
> 
>> Huh?  The conclusion was already reached that the choice of separator is
>> immaterial since it will be quoted anyway.  Pursuant to that, John and I
>> agreed to use ":" because it already has precedent with zoneadm(1M) (and
>> has been a Unix separator character in other contexts such as /etc files
>> since the dawn of time).
> 
> How should scripts unescape escaped separators?

The "read" command handles this for you if you set IFS correctly (and 
the escape character is \).

-John

> 
> Nico


Reply via email to