Nicolas Williams writes: > No, they get to contribute Wireshark support. It's the existing > functionality in snoop but not in Wireshark that we'd be saying "oh > well" about.
Unless we mark snoop as "obsolete" (as I previously suggested), we really have no good grounds for directing new projects one way or the other. I don't see that we have a good committed direction at all. > But the flip side is holding the system hostage to funding that may > never show up. Wireshark is *far* superior to snoop, so not including > Wireshark if noone will commit to making it a strict superset of snoop > would also be less than "building a system." At least by this proposal, it seems can't even get our act together enough to nuke snoop away. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
