On 6/12/07, Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams at sun.com> wrote: > > At least by this proposal, it seems can't even get our act together > > enough to nuke snoop away. > > We can't? As long as we agree that this case shouldn't have to include > adding functionality to Wireshark that is currently only available in > snoop then I think it should be near trivial to "get our act together to > nuke snoop." Or am I missing something?
Earlier Bart gave a list of dependencies for the gui, which is quite extensive. Also, it was indicated that all the components of wireshark would be delivered as a single package. Two questions: What external dependencies do the command line tools have? On a minimized system, snoop will work - will the wireshark cli utilities or do they need a lot of extra stuff? If snoop is removed and replaced by some wireshark cli utility, should the gui and cli components be packaged separately so as to allow snoop functionality to be present on machines with no gui installed? -- -Peter Tribble http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
