Michael Hunter wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:17:19 -0700 > Neal Pollack <Neal.Pollack at Sun.COM> wrote: > > [...] > >> time a reduction in total customer count. I do not think the >> introduction of a new tool should >> necessitate the removal of an existing tool. I simply view it as a long >> overdue attempt >> to make the Solaris distro "more complete". >> > [...] > > In general its hard to disagree but in this case the disparity between > snoop and wireshark is large. I hope the next time somebody brings a > protocol to PSARC not supported in snoop they wouldn't feel like they > have to update it. > > mph > Of course if we stay up to date, the hope would be that any new protocols will already be supported in wireshark. If not, then that same person that would have updated snoop will need to update wireshark.
Brian.
