Peter Tribble wrote: > On 6/12/07, Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams at sun.com> wrote: > >> > At least by this proposal, it seems can't even get our act together >> > enough to nuke snoop away. >> >> We can't? As long as we agree that this case shouldn't have to include >> adding functionality to Wireshark that is currently only available in >> snoop then I think it should be near trivial to "get our act together to >> nuke snoop." Or am I missing something? > > Earlier Bart gave a list of dependencies for the gui, which is quite > extensive. Also, it was indicated that all the components of wireshark > would be delivered as a single package. > > Two questions: > > What external dependencies do the command line tools have? On a > minimized system, snoop will work - will the wireshark cli utilities or > do they need a lot of extra stuff? > > If snoop is removed and replaced by some wireshark cli utility, should > the gui and cli components be packaged separately so as to allow > snoop functionality to be present on machines with no gui installed? >
I can certainly introduce a separate package for the GUI component (Wireshark itself) if that's deemed useful. - Bart -- Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance barts at cyber.eng.sun.com http://blogs.sun.com/barts
