Richard Lowe wrote:
> The ARC deals in interfaces though, I agree that any community
> producing code that would otherwise need to go to the ARC should and
> must do so.
>
> That is not all communities, however. I don't see any tangible
> interface producted by, for instance, advocacy.
>
> I took John's list to be non-exhaustive (since he obviously missed
> NWSC under storage, and g11n, for instance), and to be trying to imply
> that communities with nothing to ARC (no code) wouldn't interact with
> the ARC community.
>
> That does seem rather obvious though, doesn't it?
>
> -- Rich
>
I've been known to misread or misunderstand statements before. So, let me
ask directly...
Roy, John,... Do you believe that any community delivering code is
required
to interact with the ARC, and to adhere to the decisions of the ARC
(delta
override cases).
- thanks,
- jek3
