On 9/21/06, Casper.Dik at sun.com <Casper.Dik at sun.com> wrote:
> None of the arguments have swayed us so far and James explained that
> arguments prefixed with "in the future we may" are best dealt with
> in future ARC cases when things may be moved around if the need arises.
Is there any argument which has swayed you to accept /usr/bin/ksh93?
Or libshell? Or libast? I seems that there is no compelling reason to
accept ksh93 at all
--
// Martin Schaffstall
// EMail: martin.schaffstall at googlemail.com
\\ //
\X/
