James Carlson wrote: > Martin Schaffstall writes: > > On 9/21/06, Casper.Dik at sun.com <Casper.Dik at sun.com> wrote: > > > None of the arguments have swayed us so far and James explained that > > > arguments prefixed with "in the future we may" are best dealt with > > > in future ARC cases when things may be moved around if the need arises. > > > > Is there any argument which has swayed you to accept /usr/bin/ksh93? > > Yes. Just asking for it is enough. I think it's a great idea.
:-) > > Or libshell? Or libast? I seems that there is no compelling reason to > > accept ksh93 at all > > None of this justifies putting ksh into root. What about |libc::wordexp()| ? At least for correctness reasons it should work in any runlevel with and without /usr being mounted (note we have working code in the ksh93-integration prototype002 codebase which uses ksh93 for |libc::wordexp()| - in theory the code is there to fix this issue once and for all). ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090 (;O/ \/ \O;)
