Martin Schaffstall writes: > On 9/21/06, Casper.Dik at sun.com <Casper.Dik at sun.com> wrote: > > None of the arguments have swayed us so far and James explained that > > arguments prefixed with "in the future we may" are best dealt with > > in future ARC cases when things may be moved around if the need arises. > > Is there any argument which has swayed you to accept /usr/bin/ksh93?
Yes. Just asking for it is enough. I think it's a great idea. > Or libshell? Or libast? I seems that there is no compelling reason to > accept ksh93 at all None of this justifies putting ksh into root. -- James Carlson, KISS Network <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
