On 9/22/06, James Carlson <james.d.carlson at sun.com> wrote:
> I. Szczesniak writes:
> > On 9/22/06, Joseph Kowalski <Joseph.Kowalski at eng.sun.com> wrote:
> Why wouldn't this scan a ksh93-specific location first, such as a
> /usr/lib/ksh93/ directory? You could have your own libcmd.so{,.1}
> buried in there, encourage others to deliver plugin libraries to that
> separate directory, and there'd be no conflict.
Because it is not compatible to existing ksh93 versions and would not
be portable within scripts. If you ask me Sun should avoid introducing
Solaris-specific modifications to the shell.
Irek
