Stacey Jonathan Marshall - Solaris RPE wrote:
> The common usage below suggests that beer is a consumable and a format,
> as such should it be beer(4)?
> Does this make sense, beer(4) me does! How about beer(4) you?
>
> Randy Fishel wrote:
>> I am sponsoring this fasttrack on behalf of myself. The timer is set
>> to 04/01/2008.
>>
>>
>> Overview
>> ========
>> This case describes the proper usage model for the common zymological
>> beverage, beer(1). Though the beverage 'wine(1)' has similar processes
>> and has similar results, the density and concentrations are different,
>> so this case will not include 'wine(1)'. This case will also not
>> include common compression techniques (warming and cooling), but will
>> reference them.
>>
[...]
>>
>> Exporting Interfaces
>> ====================
>> Name Stability
>> ===========================================
>> Urethra Standard (and important after using beer(1))
This section is missing the other, less commonly-used, exporting interface
Esophagus Standard (usually associated with one of the keg
packages)
Dana
