On 03/24/10 11:07 AM, Hai-May Chao wrote:
> Darren J Moffat wrote:
>> I see no major issues with this case.
>>
>> However the packaging will need to be different.
>>
>> Probably one of these:
>>
>> pkg:/library/security/openssl/perl/{aes,bignum,...}
>> pkg:/library/perl-5/openssl/{aes,bignum,...}
>>
>> I think the second one is more likely as these are perl bindings for
>> openssl.
>>
>
> I'm still using SVR4 packaging scheme. I touched base with Norm,
> and he suggested for me to use SVR4 definitions for now, until SFW
> moves to IPS. Depending on the timing, I'll either change it before my
> putback or it will be changed to IPS with the rest of the gate.
>
> Thanks,
> Hai-May
>
That's fine with me, but you need to fix the "Committed" value for your
package names -- clearly they are not Committed, since you know you'll
be changing them soon.
- Garrett
