On 03/24/10 02:09 PM, Garrett D'Amore wrote: > That's fine with me, but you need to fix the "Committed" value for your > package names -- clearly they are not Committed, since you know you'll > be changing them soon.
Package names should be no less than Committed, especially now that IPS can refer to a package using an older name. Since package names are how package dependencies are built, and how software is bundled and installed, anything less than Committed doesn't make sense to me. That said, since SFW packages are delivered to the system using the hierarchical IPS scheme (e.g. diagnostic/wireshark), I don't think that the fact that the SFW gate doesn't directly deliver IPS packages is a valid reason for this case not to export a proper IPS package name, nor for the package name to be anything less than Committed. -Seb
