On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 02:22:56PM -0400, Sebastien Roy wrote: > On 03/24/10 02:09 PM, Garrett D'Amore wrote: > >That's fine with me, but you need to fix the "Committed" value for your > >package names -- clearly they are not Committed, since you know you'll > >be changing them soon. > > Package names should be no less than Committed, especially now that > IPS can refer to a package using an older name. Since package names > are how package dependencies are built, and how software is bundled > and installed, anything less than Committed doesn't make sense to > me.
I thought IPS supports pkg renaming, so why should pkg names be Committed?