Sebastien Roy wrote: > On 03/24/10 02:09 PM, Garrett D'Amore wrote: >> That's fine with me, but you need to fix the "Committed" value for your >> package names -- clearly they are not Committed, since you know you'll >> be changing them soon. > > Package names should be no less than Committed, especially now that > IPS can refer to a package using an older name. Since package names > are how package dependencies are built, and how software is bundled > and installed, anything less than Committed doesn't make sense to me. > > That said, since SFW packages are delivered to the system using the > hierarchical IPS scheme (e.g. diagnostic/wireshark), I don't think > that the fact that the SFW gate doesn't directly deliver IPS packages > is a valid reason for this case not to export a proper IPS package > name, nor for the package name to be anything less than Committed. > > -Seb
I'll update this case to reflect an IPS scheme (I'll check with Norm with regard to the names of IPS packages). The package names will be Committed. Thanks, Hai-May
