On 10/13/05, Al Hopper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Dan Price wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have submitted the following case to our internal ARC (architectural
> > review committee) but I would also appreciate external comment. This
> > is a second draft based on the initial feedback I received.
> >
> > The timer is set for 10/19/2005, so I'll take comments until then.
> > Please CC the alias when you reply. If you are a user of FMLI or
> > FACE, or know of such users, we'd obviously be interested in hearing
> > from you.
> >
> > Please note the terminology used may be seem a bit complex; you may wish to
> > consult attributes(5) for the precise meaning of terms like "Obsolete."
> >
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> > AT&T FACE and FMLI EOL
>
> RIP.
>
> Commentry: I was quite surprised that this facility was used by live
> upgrade. It seemed really out of place in a modern OS.
Indeed. Out of curiosity - why FMLI was chosen for lu(1M) ?
I assume that the process went through the necessary ARC
review and was approved there. What was the rationale ?
Regards,
Cyril
>
> Good writeup.
>
> Regards,
>
> Al Hopper Logical Approach Inc, Plano, TX. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Voice: 972.379.2133 Fax: 972.379.2134 Timezone: US CDT
> OpenSolaris.Org Community Advisory Board (CAB) Member - Apr 2005
> _______________________________________________
> opensolaris-code mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://opensolaris.org:444/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
>
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-code mailing list
[email protected]
https://opensolaris.org:444/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
