>>>>> "sch" == Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

sch>   Sounds fine.  Are you talking about the theoretical case when all
sch>   releases under discussion are open development (or at least open
sch>   source), or today's case where only SMI has a collection of
sch>   previous releases?

Neither.  I'm talking about something in the middle, where there are two
open source/development releases (an old one and a current one).

mike
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-code mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code

Reply via email to