* Mikhail Popov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-11 12:04]: > Richard Lowe wrote: > ----- > > > > "previous releases with complete source encumbrance" is impossible to handle > > (< 10), for Nevada and above, I can't think of any problem with sustaining > > gates being available containing the open parts of the tree, for those parts > > of the source base that are open (ON's usr/src, JDS, SFW, pkg tools, etc). > > > > So I'm not entirely sure what you're referring to here, could you be more > > explicit? > > What does it actually mean? moving all sustaining projects S8,S9 and > S10 (update releases) under Opensolaris umbrella? or it just a long > term plan?
It's a longer term issue. I think we're mostly interested in how to manage sustaining or maintenance of opensolaris-old, once opensolaris-next starts. Such a transition is a ways off, but it would be best to be prepared. - Stephen -- Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/ _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
