[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Ok... what about the following change: > >Signal bits 0-63 are used or reserved for "normal" signals and signals > >from 64-95 are used by realtime signals. Anything signal numbers from > >96-128 are reserved. > >This would allow 32 realtime signals (like in Linux) and avoid that they > >have to move each time a signal gets added... > >... would that work ? > > What the argument in favour of avoiding the realtime signals from > moving around? Code needs to deal with that anyway; saying that they > "won't move around for a while" might lure people into using hardcoded > constants rather than the appropriate constructs.
Erm... the idea was to make it easier for the kernel people (assuming that signal realtime numbers in the kernel are hardcoded, right (or am I wrong (again)) ?) ... ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) [EMAIL PROTECTED] \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090 (;O/ \/ \O;) _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
