Frank Van Der Linden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It has nothing to do with it directly. However, the issue is that adding
> SIGINFO would bring the number of RT signals to 7 (if NSIG/MAXSIG isn't
> bumped). This is below the minimum of 8, meaning that the total number
> of signals needs to be bumped. So, the thought leading up to this is:
> while NSIG/MAXSIG needs to be bumped, let an increase of the number of
> RT signals ride along on this change, so that these values do not have
> to be bumped again in the future.
Is there a problem with increasing the number of signals bejond 48?
It has been enhanced from 46 to 48 from Solaris 9 to Nevada anyway..
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-code mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
