Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> James Carlson wrote:
>
>> In other cases, that's not true. For example, the fact that we now
>> need SS12 to build ON isn't subject to ARC review. That's a gate
>> management issue, but it affects those who have build machines just as
>> much as one of those architectural dependencies.
>>
>
> Though given recent statements by the compiler team, maybe it should be,
> since the act of building libc.so.1 with Studio 12 means that the compiler
> team will no longer support users building their own apps with Studio 11 or
> older, and building the lint libraries with Studio 12 breaks linting
> applications using them with old Studio releases. (Their rule is that
> at link-time, you must be using the most recent version of the compiler
> used to link any object or library included in the linking.)
>
> We've silently EOF'ed Studio 11 support with this transition.
>
>
I guess I'm probably not the only person who finds this "surprising"?
I can't believe that we've got this kind of breakage.. did we also EOF
Studio 10 when we switched to Studio 11? (Its not my recollection that
we did, but then I don't pay a support contract to get support for
development tools....)
-- Garrett
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
