On 9/5/05, James Dickens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/5/05, S Destika <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes - Reiser3 , contrary to what people are saying is a good, stable FS > > which has it's benefits above others. <br><br> > > Reiser4 seems to be getting stable but I don't know for certain. (Feature > > wise it' s more promising than any of the other existing file systems on > > Linux but not sure if any one immediately needs that kind of features.) > > i guess its the old story.... > > too little too late > > corrupt my data once, shame on you... > corrupt my data twice, shame on me.
Same story here, though I could say the same about early versions of XFS for Linux. I can't recall a single case of data corruption that I could blame on ext2/ext3. -- Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
