>There is a campaign against the CDDL and I don't know who's behind that campaign.
Not sure... >A week ago, I did enhance the amount of information about the CDDL >on wikipedia and yesterday, this additional information has been removed. >From my point of view, all the important information is still there. The entry was just fixed, to not sound like a religious war. IMHO if you want to point your finger at FSF then you should add a "controversy" section. See the diff http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Common_Development_and_Distribution_License&diff=69440919&oldid=68681390 Mika # mv Disclaimer.txt /dev/null ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This message is intended for the addressee only and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended receiver, any disclosure, copying to any person or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on this e-mail, is prohibited and may be un- lawful. You must therefore delete this e-mail. Internet communications may not be secure or error-free and may contain viruses. They may be subject to possible data corruption, accidental or on purpose. This e-mail is not and should not be construed as an offer or the solicitation of an offer to purchase or subscribe or sell or redeem any investments. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
