Joerg Schilling stated:
< Jim Grisanzio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
< 
< > People waiting for "uptake" will get it in due time. Let's give them the 
< > benefit of the doubt and educate them (as you guys are doing). I think 
< > they need to see more projects using CDDL, and I think they have a valid 
< > point. OpenSolaris uses CDDL. Glassfish uses CDDL. NetBeans uses CDDL. 
< > That's a lot of code right there. And Open Media Commons uses CDDL, but 
< > I'm not sure what else. What am I missing? What non-Sun projects are 
< > using CDDL? That will be the metric that moves people looking for uptake.


  Lets not forget this gem:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.solaris/browse_thread/thread/738bc2550bef2ac1/8b7cd7d2196a0d91

< 
< The first complete program that used the CDDL (since February 2005) was star.
< 
< Since May 2006, cdrtools (cdrecord + others) use mainly the CDDL. Total ~ 8MB 
< of code, 260000 lines of code. 29% of the complete project is still under GPL 
< (mkisofs).
< 
< Of course, SchilliX, Belenix and Nexenta are under CDDL....
< 
< For the rest look e.g. at: http://freshmeat.net/browse/1103/
< 
< I don't know how they measuure "upcome".... do they wait until 1000 useless
< tiny and projects appear under CDDL?
< 
< Jörg
< 
< -- 
<  EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
<        [EMAIL PROTECTED]                (uni)  
<        [EMAIL PROTECTED]     (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
<  URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
< _______________________________________________
< opensolaris-discuss mailing list
< [email protected]

-- 
Sean.
.
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to