[..]
QUite, though for root this matter less.  The pf* shells are an implementation
artefact which I am planning on fixing so you can have pfanysh (including
bash)

that looks interesting. what do you mean by "implementation artifact" here?

>BASH also occupies more memory. But to each his or her own. I have
>nothing against people using BASH. I just don't recommend it as a root
>shell.
>
>Please don't BASH me ok? Otherwise BASH advocates would gain a rather
>violent reputation......


I would say that from an technical point of few there is no longer
a reason not to change root's shell as all shells are dynamically linked.

I'd suggest merging /usr with /, just in case, but bash does not depend
on anything from /usr either, it seems.

I've changed root's shell on a number of systems, therefor it cannot
be wrong :-)


with rbac available why bother?

nacho
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to