On 8/10/07, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Unless the putting the code into gpl tree is something we *badly want*, > > if there is ambiguity and scope for legal battle, err on the side that > > avoids litigation. No point in getting into litigations that distracts > > & frustrates everyone. > > > > While contributing CDDL code to GPL code might not be a problem, that > > part of the contributed CDDL code would need to be re-licensed or > > dual-licensed under GPL compatible code. > > ZFS is a separate "work", you do not need to relicense it under the GPL and > you > cannot. >
*I* cannot, because I am not the owner of the copyright. Point was about mixing CDDL & GPL and why it *is a problem* Sane thing is to follow legal advice by the qualified. It seems to have its good share of problems and need not be done. There is no compelling need either. regards Shiv _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
