>I think you're missing the point I'm making. The Indiana project >functions as a WOS -- as a distributor. As such, it can make >inclusion decisions about other projects that others cannot make (or >even challenge), and its decisions affect what is included as the >"reference" for OpenSolaris.
And seemingly without any oversight, architecture review, etc, etc. >That's a significant community-wide power. It's a big change, without >regard to the trademark legal issues. Indeed. >Alternatives include simply changing the name to "Sun's OpenSolaris" >or "Indiana" to make it clear that the wider community isn't intended >to be subject to this project team's decisions. > >None of this says "stop," so I just don't agree with your assertions. No, it just says "rename". Casper _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
