Joerg Schilling wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >>>> It's very simple, Joerg, first to integrate wins. >>>> >>> WRONG: in the OSS world the first user os a name wins and the imagemagick >>> name >>> is thus illegal. >>> >> Says who? And who keeps the record or registry? >> > > > Do you like to ignore that my compare is genric and thus correctly using > the name and that it is 20 years older than imagemagick? > This is really beside the point within the context of a distro. How does other Linux distro handle this? > > >>> Because if Sun does not rename the image magick program Sun verifies that >>> PSARC discussions are just to fool people but do not have useful resaults. >>> >> Remember Joerg, being listened to is NOT the same as getting your way. >> > > It is just another chance to verify that there is collaboration on OpenSolaris > and not just ignorant domination from Sun..... > Let not argue your case by calling us ignorant! The point is imagemagik is integrated. It is not against any ARC rule in name space assignment. If indeed you have submitted an ARC earlier with the intention to integrate, ARC will definitely advise against the imagemagik case to rename or some sort. > Do we have an OpenSolaris community or is this just a fake? > What response might you get if you make the same proposal to other Linux community like ubuntu or fedora? Suggesting to them I have this 20 years old binary, however, it does not run in your distro, but I like to reserve the name. Do you think this is reasonable?
-Ghee > The real compare is 20 years older and I did _warn_ _before_ the name appeared > in /usr/bin. For this reason, this is an important bug in Solaris Express. > > Jörg > > _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
