Joerg Schilling wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>   
>> PSARC discussions happen ONLY in the context of the product/release under
>> for which the product is "ARC'ed".
>>
>> Your "compare" is NOT part of that product; nor is there even an ARC
>> case proposing it.
>>
>> Your "compare" does not exist in the context of the product "Solaris".
>>
>> It is therefor *completely* irrelevant to a PSARC discussion.
>>     
>
> Collaboration happens in the community.
>
> If you are a member of the OpenSolaris community, you should try 
> to collaborate.
>
> This is a case to see whether there is collaboration or domination!
>
>   
But Solaris != OpenSolaris. Right? Or am I missing something.
Just because something is one way in Solaris doesn't mean it has to be 
that way in (any particular distribution of) OpenSolaris.

Solaris is one distribution. It's Sun's Distribution. I don't think it's 
correct to call them applying their rules (rules which it sounds like 
have been used since Solaris was started) to how they manage it.

The community will have it's say in the other distributions that are 
created from OpenSolaris. If one or more of those distributions wants to 
do what you're suggesting, then it can. And (while I haven't read the 
gonverning documents, I'm pretty sure) Sun can't do anything to stop that.

I'm not surprised there are disagreements like this appearing in this 
community. It has to be expected that this many people are not going to 
agree on everything. I think that's why it was smart to plan for 
multiple distributions. It leaves rooms for groups of like minded people 
to do things differently.

I think we have to expect more things like this in the future. And if 
Sun does what it thinks needs to be done in Solaris, I don't see it as 
being heavy handed.They're just one sub-community (with their own way of 
working out these disagreements internally to their group) within the 
larger community.

  -Kyle

     -Kyle
> Jörg
>
>   

_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to