> VirtualBox is way faster than QEMU, though it shares > some of the code. I like it already. There are a few > issues here and there, but other than that, it's > great. Nice product Sun bought there. > > Also, obligatory posturing screenshot, showing > seamless mode, currently only working on Xinerama > screen 1 under Twinview :(, under Compiz: > > http://www.storageserver.be/images/vbox.jpg > (3200x1200, 400KB) > > -mg
Hmm...qemu can run on SPARC (without kqemu or the like, obviously). Enough for DOS or at least Windows 3.1 (sort of have the latter working); maybe even enough for Windows 98, although I don't have a copy of that. Is VirtualBox substantially more dependent on running on underlying x86 hardware, or could it also run on non-x86 hardware, perhaps faster than qemu (although obviously still not what most people would call fast)? This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
