On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 6:18 AM, W. Wayne Liauh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As far as "faster" goes, the guest system is more > > responsive. > > > > -mg > > The first time I heard about VirtualBox was about a year or so ago when I > attended a Linux activity in Taiwan. Everyone was talking about VirtualBox, > and how much better it is over VMWare. > > Knowing the Linux community's propensity to talk up certain things, I didn't > take their words seriously--until I tried it myself. Running Windows XP in > SuSE gives a noticeably more "natural" feeling under VirtualBox than under > VMWare Player. Perhaps VMWare workstation may be better or at least as good. > But since I run Windows only very occasionally, if at all, it is very > difficult to justify spending the $198 per machine for the VMWare workstation. >
Network performance of VirtualBox is not good enough on my side, at least. -Aubrey _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
