When you buy a company you inherit both their assets and it's obligations.  And 
I use both in a sense that goes beyond merely dollar.  The Sun brand and 
goodwill associated thereis would be one such example.  Sun made a public 
commitment to open source Solaris.  Oracle is morally bound to honor that 
commitment.  Whether OpenSolaris generates profit or not is immaterial but that 
is does not, for all practical purposes, seems to some to be justification for 
free discharge of the obligation to honor Sun's promises.  Corporations want to 
enjoy the benefit of being a 'legal person' but don't want to pay the requisite 
dues.  If Oracle did not want to inherit the moral obligation to follow thru on 
Sun's commitment to open source Solaris, Oracle should have let Sun go bankrupt 
before stepping in.  However, in my mind, while that may have absolved them of 
some of their financial commitments, it wouldn't necessarily follow that such 
would absolve them from the moral obligation to compl
 ete the full open sourcing of Solaris.

But hey, we don't seem to give a damn about morals and obligations anymore and  
_any_and_all reprehensible behavior seems to be justified so long as it turns a 
profit.  Yet look where all this greed got us?  I guess being on the brink of 
total economic collapse wasn't enough of a wake up call.....
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to