> > I think it's a lot worse. It's not just
> > non-production use, it's only licensed for
> software
> > development, and only for use by a single person.
> I
> > can't think of many places where you could
> actually
> > use it. All of my software developers need to
> allow
> > someone else onto their machines from time to
> time.
> > In most cases home use isn't software development.
> I
> > don't think you could use it to assess Solaris 11,
> > since (1) that isn't software development and (2)
> > you'd normally need to have more than one person
> use
> > it. 
> > 
> > With Sun you could say "well, their lawyers went
> > overboard. They don't really mean that." With
> Oracle
> > I strongly recommend against such an approach.
> > 
> > "only for the purpose of developing, testing,
> > prototyping and demonstrating your applications,
> and
> > not for any other purpose."
> > 
> > " The Programs may be installed on one computer
> only,
> > and used by one person"
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm studying computer science and  I  wanted to use
> solaris 11 ex at home to  learn solaris, that may
> count as developing, since i will be coding and
> testing and demonstrating to myself that i can code
>  a decent program:-)
> may be reading to much in to the license,however, i
> found another clause,it may be of  some concern to
> a few, is oracle, has the right to audit the use of
>  the Programs, i don't know how
> n my opinion the way this license was written is like
> they are limiting the use to a point where the user
> has to  to buy support. I love open source,
> free(freedom)  software and this going  against
>  that.  
> 
> the clause: 
> 
> LICENSE RIGHTS
> We may audit your use of the Programs. Program
> documentation, if available, may be accessed online
> at http://otn.oracle.com/docs.
> 
> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/licenses/solaris-clu
> ster-express-license-167852.html
> 
> 
> Regardsti
> Edward

"Right to audit" is an inherent part of a software license, I wouldn't read too 
much into it, and PLEASE don't subconsciously try to paint Oracle as a bad guy 
until you have had a chance to become familiar with other similar licenses.  
(After all, this is an Oracle-sponsored forum, isn't it?)

That said, if you don't feel comfortable with the new license, there are 
OpenIndiana, IllumOS, SchilliX, Jaris, EON, Milax, etc.  In a sense, tightening 
up the licensing language is not necessarily a negative thing.  AFAIC, Oracle 
has a new design for how Solaris should be accepted, and, AFAIC, I respect 
Oracle's right to do that.
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Reply via email to