In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 09:42:12PM -0500
Your explanation is very much appreciated :-)
Now - is there any reason why I should not substitute apache_1.3.17 ???
Or is there really any reason I should not just use apache_1.3.14 (This is in a linux
system)
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 09:42:12PM -0500, tc lewis wrote:
>
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Ben Laurie in hie website at www.apache-ssl.org shows the current release to be
>apache_1.3.14+ssl_1.42 yes the openssl website shows the latest release of openssl to
>be 0.9.6
> >
> > Why don't the version numbers agree and what releases should actually be used?
>
> apache_1.3.14+ssl_1.42
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> version of apache the release was made for/tested with/etc.
>
> apache_1.3.14+ssl_1.42
> ^^^^^^^^
> version of the entire package. the "apache-ssl" package.
>
>
> much like:
> mod_ssl-2.8.0-1.3.17
> ^^^^^
> version of the modssl package.
>
> mod_ssl-2.8.0-1.3.17
> ^^^^^^
> version of apache it was made for/etc.
>
> both of them require openssl (0.9.5a or higher, probably), but the goal of
> those projects isn't to be an extension to openssl--but rather an
> extension to apache.
>
> -tcl.
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
