In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 26 Jan 2004 12:07:56 +0100, Andy Polyakov 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

appro> > and other details I'm not aware of.  I've heard
appro> > suggestions of creating several variants of the OpenSSL libraries that
appro> > would be used in parallell with the different MSVC libraries, and
appro> > that's where a naming convention is becoming even more important.
appro> 
appro> I'd say that we should rather strive for being more like USER32 or any
appro> other system component, i.e. being MT-safe and neutral to any particular
appro> compiler run-time environment.

That would be great, so how does one do that?

appro> > Added to this problem, we have the different register sizes on
appro> > different CPUs (32-bit, 64-bit, and whatever will follow), which seems
appro> > to be difficult to intermix in the same library,
appro>         ^^^^^^^^^??? It's impossible.

I wasn't ready to use such a terminal word.

appro> You can't intermix 64- and 32-bit objects in same library nor
appro> in address space of any particular process.  Well, the latter
appro> is possible from hardware point of view, but it requires kernel
appro> support and there is no any [as far as I know]. Naming
appro> convention for 32- vs. 64-bit objects is provided rather
appro> through search pathes [at both link- and run-time], than name
appro> of the object module per se.

Good point.

-----
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.

-- 
Richard Levitte   \ Tunnlandsvägen 3  \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  \ S-168 36  BROMMA  \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
                    \      SWEDEN       \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis                -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/

Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to