On 01/11/2017 08:43 AM, Richard Levitte wrote: > A note: I have absolutely nothing against the addition of SIPhash in > our collection of hash algos. My scepticism was only in regards to > using it as a string hasher for our hash tables indexes. >
Understood. Can you further clarify whether you would like to maintain the existing 20-year-old hand-rolled hash function for that purpose or are open to using a more modern hash (not necessarily SIPhash; there are also things like the Jenkins hash to consider)? -Ben
-- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
