--On Friday, March 24, 2017 5:40 PM +0000 "Salz, Rich" <rs...@akamai.com> wrote:

The required source  code disclosures of the MPL are problematic.  The
fact that the MPL allows distribution under a non-patent-protecting
license is problematic.


Thanks Rich, that's a more useful starting point. Has dual licensing been considered? Both in 2015 and now, the lack of GPLv2 compatibility has shown to be a serious drawback to the APLv2.



Quanah Gibson-Mount
Product Architect
Symas Corporation
Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP:

openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

Reply via email to