--On Friday, March 24, 2017 6:12 PM +0000 "Salz, Rich" <rs...@akamai.com>
Thanks Rich, that's a more useful starting point. Has dual licensing
been considered? Both in 2015 and now, the lack of GPLv2 compatibility
has shown to be a serious drawback to the APLv2.
Dual licensing means that it is also available under a
no-patent-protection license which is an issue for us.
APLv2 and MPLv2 both have patent protections. How would a dual license of
APL+MPL result in a no-patent-protection license?
Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP:
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev