> Thanks Rich, that's a more useful starting point.  Has dual licensing been
> considered?  Both in 2015 and now, the lack of GPLv2 compatibility has
> shown to be a serious drawback to the APLv2.

Dual licensing means that it is also available under a no-patent-protection 
license which is an issue for us.  

openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

Reply via email to