On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 07:38:48AM +0200, Richard Levitte wrote: > In message <c60d8170-70cb-44a7-86bd-9463d1a02...@akamai.com> on Sat, 14 Apr > 2018 21:13:47 +0000, "Salz, Rich" <rs...@akamai.com> said: > > rsalz> We have *no* data points, except our tests, that anything fails to > work. > rsalz> In fact, we are increasingly collecting data that shows everything is > just fine. > > Errr, are we? Please inform me, because I cannot remember having seen > tests that specifically targets the case of programs built with 1.1.0 > that get implicitly relinked with 1.1.1 libraries (that's what you > call "going forward", isn't it?), or data collection for that matter. > I may have missed something, but I am interested.
In Debian we've done a rebuild test of all source packages that link to 1.1.0 to build against pre2 instead, and as far as I know only 1 package was found to fail because of that: #5637 This is of course slightly different than just upgrading the library since it can pick up new header files, but I think this is close enough. It also only covers those packages that have a test suite. Kurt _______________________________________________ openssl-project mailing list openssl-project@openssl.org https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project
